Nuked 
Hello, tech enthusiasts! Today, we’re diving into an intriguing topic that blends artificial intelligence with the age-old debate of free speech.
A clever developer, who prefers to stay anonymous, has created a platform known as SpeechMap. This tool allows us to assess how various AI chatbots, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Elon Musk’s Grok, handle sensitive or controversial topics.
The core mission of SpeechMap is to evaluate how these distinct AI models respond to challenging questions, especially regarding political issues and civil rights discussions. This evaluation comes at a time when some political figures have accused popular chatbots of being overly cautious or ‘woke’, which has stirred quite a bit of debate.
While companies like OpenAI are adjusting their models to dissuade censorship of viewpoints, SpeechMap aims to provide transparency and foster a public discussion about the limits of AI. The developer behind this initiative believes it’s crucial to make these discussions open, rather than confined to corporate boardrooms.
SpeechMap operates by comparing responses from AI models to a pre-defined set of prompts across different subjects. The responses are classified based on their level of engagement, revealing trends in compliance and evasiveness when addressing contentious topics.
Interestingly, while some chatbots are becoming less willing to engage in political debates, Grok seems to be moving in the opposite direction, showcasing a higher compliance with controversial queries.
With changing dynamics in AI development, these trends highlight the complex relationship between technology and the interpretation of free speech.
