Hello to all my tech enthusiasts! Today, we’re diving into the fascinating world of legal drama as we explore a high-profile fraud trial that has everyone talking.

In a case that’s captured public attention, Charlie Javice, the former CEO of the startup Frank, is facing off against JPMorgan Chase in a trial filled with unexpected twists and turns.

Javice was accused of deceiving the banking giant into purchasing her startup for a staggering $175 million. The catch? Frank reportedly had only 300,000 customers instead of the claimed four million.

Testimonies have painted a colorful picture of behind-the-scenes maneuvers, particularly one where a former engineer recalled refusing to create fake user data just days before the sale.

This engineer, Patrick Vovor, revealed a chilling exchange where Javice expressed concerns about landing in an orange jumpsuit. When he declined her request, she turned to a math professor to generate synthetic data instead.

While Javice’s team claims that JPMorgan neglected proper vetting of Frank’s user base, uncomfortable details continue emerging. Notably, Leslie Wims Morris, who spearheaded the deal at JPMorgan, added context to internal communications by referencing a CEO letter that suggested sometimes no analysis was necessary.

Javice’s defense argued this reflects JPMorgan’s careless approach to due diligence, while Morris characterized her comment as a light-hearted joke.