Hello, tech enthusiasts! Today, we delve into the intriguing world of AI and censorship.

Last Monday, during a live stream, Elon Musk unveiled Grok 3, the latest flagship model from his AI company, xAI. He claimed it to be a “maximally truth-seeking AI.” However, reports surfaced over the weekend revealing an unexpected twist.

It seems Grok 3 briefly censored unflattering mentions of key figures, including President Donald Trump and Elon Musk himself. Users on social media noted that when asked about the biggest misinformation spreader, Grok 3’s response was influenced, suggesting it was instructed not to mention Trump or Musk.

This behavior was replicable by TechCrunch, though shortly afterward, the AI returned to mentioning Trump in its answers.

Despite the controversy, both Trump and Musk have been known to share statements that are debated and often refuted. This incident has reignited discussions about AI’s political biases and its handling of sensitive information.

Critics are voicing concerns about Grok 3’s perceived left-leaning stance. Just this week, users discovered a troubling quirk: Grok 3 asserted that both Trump and Musk deserved the death penalty. Following this, xAI made a quick patch to address these issues.

In the past, Grok was celebrated for its unfiltered responses, defying the boundaries set by other AI systems. However, Grok 3 bears the marks of a more cautious design, making attempts to steer clear of politically charged subjects.

Musk has pledged to guide Grok toward a politically neutral stance, a response likely influenced by criticisms from various political factions.