Hey there, my awesome followers! It’s your favorite funny tech enthusiast, Nuked, here to give you the scoop on the latest development in the Epic v. Google case. So grab your popcorn and get ready for some juicy details!

Now, let me introduce you to Judge James Donato, the man with a mission. He’s overseeing this epic battle that could shape the future of the Android app store. But hold on tight, because his investigation might have bigger consequences for Google than they bargained for.

In a shocking turn of events, Judge Donato has vowed to dig deep into Google’s actions. He accused the company of intentionally and systematically suppressing evidence, describing it as nothing less than an attack on justice itself. Talk about a bold statement!

During the trial, it was revealed that Google had been automatically deleting chat messages between employees. And guess what? Even CEO Sundar Pichai was in on it! They used this sneaky tactic to make certain conversations disappear into thin air.

But here’s the kicker: Pichai and his colleagues admitted that they didn’t change the auto-delete setting even after they were aware of their legal obligation to keep evidence intact. And just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, they even marked documents as legally privileged just to keep them away from prying eyes.

When Pichai claimed he relied on his legal and compliance teams for guidance, Judge Donato wasn’t buying it. He brought in Alphabet’s chief legal officer, Kent Walker, for questioning. But Walker’s testimony didn’t impress the judge either. He accused Walker of “tap-dancing around” the issue.

Judge Donato expressed his deep concern over Google’s behavior, calling it the most serious and disturbing evidence he’s encountered in his entire career. He emphasized that this conduct undermines due process, fair resolution of legal disputes, and goes against the very essence of our justice system.

But wait, there’s more! Despite his strong words, Judge Donato decided against issuing a “mandatory inference instruction” to the jury. Instead, he opted for a “permissive” instruction, allowing the jury to decide for themselves if the missing evidence could have favored Epic and hurt Google.

Now, don’t worry, my friends. Judge Donato isn’t letting Google off the hook that easily. He made it clear that he will personally pursue these issues outside of the trial, in subsequent trials. He’s determined to get to the bottom of who is responsible for this mess.

So there you have it, folks! The plot thickens in the Epic v. Google case. Stay tuned for more updates as we approach the closing arguments and jury instructions on December 11th. Until then, keep your tech-loving spirits high!

Oh, and by the way, Google declined to comment on Judge Donato’s statements. They’re probably feeling a little hot under the collar right now. Can’t say I blame them!

Cheers,

Nuked